Use Of Transaction Code F110 And F111

https://technicalgyanguru.com/sap-s-4hana-transaction-codes/What exactly the use of transaction code F111 is. The customizing for both F110 and F111 is through the same transaction FBZP. Is that correct or is there any different setting for F111. 

Answer:

The following explains the difference between F110 and F111

F110 is used for payments of open invoices.

1. Can be used to pay open invoices in the customer and Vendor accounts.

2. Configuration of Bank determination should be done in FBZP. Other than Bank determination you configure other steps in FBZP for both F110 and F111. 

3. No need for payment request clearing account.

4. Use alpha (A to Z) as payment method. This is just a good practice to distinguish between them and is not a SAP requirement.
 

F111 is used for payment of payment advices created through tcode F-59

1. Can be used to pay only payment requests created by modules like Treasury, In-House cash etc.

2. Configuration path for bank determination is – IMG – Financial accounting (new) – Bank Accounting – Business transaction – Payment transaction – Payment request and payment handling.

3. You need for payment request clearing account for each company code.

4. Use numbers (0 to 9). This is just a good practice to distinguish between them and is not a SAP requirement.
 

Though both are for automatic payments, F110 will pay only open items from vendors and customers.  F111 can also pay ‘payment-requests’ against GL items. 

Generally for making payments towards any expense (say tax authorities) we will not create any vendors, but we can still create payment requests by debiting the tax expense account and have this request paid by automatic payment program (F111)

F111 is also used for making payment via payment requests for treasury activities where we cannot create vendors.


you may be interested in this blog here

Building Interactive Forms with Adobe LiveCycle Designer
oracle dba architecture interview questions

Is Salesforce CPQ Trailhead Good Choice to Learn?

The Future of Media Consumption: What Tech Buyers Expect in 2024 and Beyond…

  • Related Posts

    AI-Code Creates More Testing Work: Adapting to Increased Demand |

    Learn about the impact of AI-generated code on QA teams and strategies for adapting to increased testing demands. | Bright-Minds Training Institute, Pune

    Bridging the Gap: How Automation Addresses Understaffing in QA Teams |

    Learn how automation is helping to address the understaffing crisis in quality assurance teams, improving efficiency and enhancing software products. Discover best practices for implementing automation and explore the future of QA automation at Bright-Minds.

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    You Missed

    AI-Code Creates More Testing Work: Adapting to Increased Demand |

    • By Varad
    • October 24, 2026
    • 5 views
    AI-Code Creates More Testing Work: Adapting to Increased Demand |

    Bridging the Gap: How Automation Addresses Understaffing in QA Teams |

    • By Varad
    • October 23, 2026
    • 14 views
    Bridging the Gap: How Automation Addresses Understaffing in QA Teams |

    Selenium BiDi: A Game Changer for Browser Automation |

    • By Varad
    • October 22, 2026
    • 18 views
    Selenium BiDi: A Game Changer for Browser Automation |

    Catch Regressions First: The Power of Continuous Performance Baselines

    • By Varad
    • October 21, 2026
    • 31 views
    Catch Regressions First: The Power of Continuous Performance Baselines

    uman Oversight in AI Testing

    • By Varad
    • October 19, 2026
    • 23 views
    uman Oversight in AI Testing

    Harnessing Observability for Automated Regression Tests

    • By Varad
    • October 18, 2026
    • 30 views
    Harnessing Observability for Automated Regression Tests